Comments on: What’s The Difference Between Linux And Windows 2003 Hosting?

By: interview question and answer

interview question and answer — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:16:12 +0000

In Linux, when typing the URL, case does matter, Linux sees “URL” different from “Url”, Windows does not. Linux is less prone to viruses due to the nature of the operating system, since both are on the public internet, they can both be hacked, it is up the hosting company to secure that. Aside from that not much else that really matters except if you build the website in Publisher, you will have problems running it on a Linux server (my first website mistake, none of the pages loaded correctly).

By: oohay_me

oohay_me — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:39:59 +0000

For linux hosting , you might not have services like asp.net
available and hence it is cheap

By: Dr Virus

Dr Virus — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:05:44 +0000

If you thinks about:
Visitor satisfaction, reliability, uptime, security, then use Linux hosting.
http://www-thehostingchart.com/?igojo=1&…

By: Gigglebo

Gigglebo — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:55:20 +0000

It depends on what you want from your web site. The Linux server will be more secure for your site. If you want to connect to a database you will need to learn a bit about MySQL (probably) and writing PHP web pages. The Windows server will be more prone to worms and malicious attack and you will need to learn MS SQL server and writing ASP web pages if you want to connect that to a database.
I prefer the Linux solution but others will tell you differently…

By: John K

John K — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:20:43 +0000

There are many differences. Linux is best. 2003 server is microsoft base. and virus is specially designed for microsoft attacked on microsoft….linux is much relible……….